<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SocialMedia.com.. Not scammers but are they serious?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnhasson.com/index.php/socialmediacom-not-scammers-but-omfg-are-they-serious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnhasson.com/index.php/socialmediacom-not-scammers-but-omfg-are-they-serious/</link>
	<description>PPC Lead Geneneration, Affiliate Product Sales, Programming, Cool Math Neural Net &#38; Pattern Matching Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:52:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Berman</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhasson.com/index.php/socialmediacom-not-scammers-but-omfg-are-they-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Berman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhasson.com/?p=300#comment-346</guid>
		<description>i actually just signed up with socialmedia.com. so you saying they are not worth it? i am still not exactly sure what they are (i know they sell ads into facebook apps)..can you give an example of how to use socialmedia.com to promote a cpa offer? would really appreciate it. thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i actually just signed up with socialmedia.com. so you saying they are not worth it? i am still not exactly sure what they are (i know they sell ads into facebook apps)..can you give an example of how to use socialmedia.com to promote a cpa offer? would really appreciate it. thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hasson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhasson.com/index.php/socialmediacom-not-scammers-but-omfg-are-they-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hasson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhasson.com/?p=300#comment-333</guid>
		<description>Funny thing is that I found out because the traffic is converting again.  So if this holds up they will be getting a lot more of my money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny thing is that I found out because the traffic is converting again.  So if this holds up they will be getting a lot more of my money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hasson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhasson.com/index.php/socialmediacom-not-scammers-but-omfg-are-they-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hasson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhasson.com/?p=300#comment-332</guid>
		<description>Well they credited my account today.  (They haven&#039;t told they credited it yet, but they did.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well they credited my account today.  (They haven&#8217;t told they credited it yet, but they did.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew wee</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhasson.com/index.php/socialmediacom-not-scammers-but-omfg-are-they-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew wee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhasson.com/?p=300#comment-331</guid>
		<description>They might have poor or no analytics involved and be flying by the seat of their pants.

Maybe have Mario screencap everything?

They might not be that savvy to pull up historical data and analyze it intelligently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They might have poor or no analytics involved and be flying by the seat of their pants.</p>
<p>Maybe have Mario screencap everything?</p>
<p>They might not be that savvy to pull up historical data and analyze it intelligently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hasson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhasson.com/index.php/socialmediacom-not-scammers-but-omfg-are-they-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hasson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhasson.com/?p=300#comment-330</guid>
		<description>I think the most frustrating thing is the impression I get they they don&#039;t know how their own system works (deleted ad makes it so they cant find it even when I give them their own internal tracking guid?  right...)  They can&#039;t match up the 14th with the 17th.  Their only way of matching up clicks to spends is to look at a daily charge and guessing that since it is lower then the amount that it wasn&#039;t charged....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the most frustrating thing is the impression I get they they don&#8217;t know how their own system works (deleted ad makes it so they cant find it even when I give them their own internal tracking guid?  right&#8230;)  They can&#8217;t match up the 14th with the 17th.  Their only way of matching up clicks to spends is to look at a daily charge and guessing that since it is lower then the amount that it wasn&#8217;t charged&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

